An Independent Review of New Zealand's Biosecurity Surveillance Systems-References

Background & Disclaimer

Sector Report References [Contained In Square Brackets]

1. McDowall, R., Biosecurity - freshwater fish issues. 2002, NIWA: Christchurch.

2. Goddard, S., New Zealand Biosecurity Strategy - Key issues identified by the Department of Conservation. 2001, DOC: Wellington. p. 15.

3. OIE, International Aquatic Animal Health Code, 4th Edition. 2001, Paris, France. Office International des Epizooties. 155.

4. MAF, Freshwater fish health survey - Strategy and Costs. 2002, MAF Animals Biosecurity: Wellington.

5. MAFBA, MAF standard for surveillance in approved establishments for export of salmon for human consumption to Australia. 2000, MAF Biosecurity Authority.

6. NIWA, New Zealand Freshwater Fish Database. 2002, NIWA, Hamilton.

7. Gillard, M., Operations and Contracts Manager, NZ King salmon Company, Nelson. Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

8. MAF, Health status and health regulation of the New Zealand Salmon aquaculture industry. 2000 MAF Regulatory Authority. p. 20.

9. Dedual, M., Taupo Basin fish disease records. 2002, DOC.

10. Hicks, G., Summary of Department of Conservation Surveillance Activities. 2002, Unpublished report, Department of Conservation.

11. Studholm, B., Project Leader South Island Pest Fish Survey, DOC, Nelson, Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

12. MAF, Schedule two to Memorandum of Understanding BA100/01: Operational agreement between the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Ministry of Fisheries. 2002, MAF/MFish.

13. MAF, Schedule three to Memorandum of Understanding BA100/01: Operational agreement between the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Department of Conservation. 2002, MAF/DOC.

14. Belton, D., CTO Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

15. OIE, Report of the meeting of OIE fish diseases commission: Paris 17-20 September 2001. 2002, Office Interantional des Epizooties. p. 33.

16. Strickland, R., FW fisheries, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

17. Cohen, A. The highly invaded ecosystem of San Francisco Bay. in NIMS 2002: The 2nd national workshop on marine biosecurity. 2002. Nelson: Cawthron Institute.

18. O'Brien, C., CTO Ministry of Fisheries, Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

19. Sinner, J. A biosecurity Strategy for New Zealand. in NIMS 2002: The 2nd national workshop on marine biosecurity. 2002. Nelson.

20. Hayden, B., Review of Marine Biosecurity Surveillance. 2002, NIWA: Christchurch. p. 16.

21. MFish, Biosecurity issues important for native species. 2001.

22. MFish, Biosecurity introduction document. 2001, Ministry of Fisheries.

23. MFish, Briefing for the Incoming Minister, December 1999. 1999, Ministry of Fisheries.

24. MFish, Our marine biodiversity is very special. Don't take it for granted! 2000, Ministry of Fisheries.

25. Anon, Undaria: The alien seaweed that could become the "Curse of the sea." 2000, DOC/MFish joint publication. p. 8.

26. Stuart, M. and D. McClay, Undaria Survey 2002. 2002. 6p.

27. Samson, A., Have you seen this crab, or seaweed? in The Saturday Express. 2001: Blenheim.

28. Baker, A., Unusual mortality of the New Zealand sea lion, Phocarctos hookeri, Auckland islands, January - February 1998. 1998, Department of Conservation.

29. Taylor, M., Biosecurity Section Leader, Cawthron. Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

30. Sinner, J. and N. Gibbs, A proposed framework for the management of biosecurity risks at the New Zealand border. Revised final report. 1988, Biosecurity Council: Wellington.

31. Anon, Nation Pest Plant Accord - 2001. 2001.

32. Willing, J., Senior Policy Analyst MFish, Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

33. Hanley, R. Development of a risk assessment model for introduced marine pests. in NIMS 2002: 2nd national workshop on marine biosecurity. 2002. Nelson.

34. Inglis, G.J., Criteria for selecting New Zealand ports and other points of entry that have a high risk of invasion by new exotic marine organisms. Research Report for Ministry of Fisheries Research Project ZBS2000/04 Objectives 1 & 2. 2001, NIWA Client Report, Wellington. p. 27 p.

35. Inglis, G.J., Criteria for identifying and selecting high value locations and locations at Risk of Invasion by Exotic Marine Organisms in New Zealand. Final Research Report for Ministry of Fisheries Research Project ZBS2000/01A, Objectives 1 & 2. 2001, NIWA Client Report, Wellington. p. 49p.

36. Taylor, M.D. and L.A. MacKenzie, Delimitation survey of the toxic dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum in New Zealand. 2001, Cawthron Report 661.

37. Cawthron, Dinoflagellate database. 2002.

38. Hine, P.A., J.B. Jones, and B.K. Diggle, A checklist of the parasites of New Zealand fishes, including previously unpublished records. Technical report series 75. 2000, Wellington: NIWA. 95.

39. Diggles, B.K., et al., A handbook of diseases of importance to aquaculture in New Zealand. NIWA Science and Technology Series, ed. N. Science Communication. Vol. No. 49. 2002, Wellington: National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. 200.

40. Hine, M., Fish Diseases Expert NCDI: Wellington, Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

41. McDowall, R., Biosecurity issues with aquatic macrophytes - notes from a telephone discussion with NIWA aquatic weed scientists Paul Champion and John Clayton. 2002, NIWA: Christchurch.

42. Hicks, G., CTO DOC, Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

43. Harris, S., Meeting the requirements of the Biosecurity Act 1993: Cost benefit analysis of proposed pest management strategies for Johnson grass, cape tulip, salvina and water Hyacinth. Interim report. 1996, Harris Consulting. 37p.

44. Champion, P.D. and J.S. Clayton, Border control for potential aquatic weeds: Stage 1. Weed risk model. 2000, Department of Conservation: Wellington. 48p.

45. Champion, P.D. and J.S. Clayton, Border control for potential aquatic weeds: Stage 2. Weed risk assessment. 2001, Department of Conservation. 30p.

46. NIWA, Fresh Water Macrophyte database. 2002.

47. Gill, G., Action on new plant pests, in Biosecurity. 2002: Wellington.

48. IUCN, IUCN guidelines for the prevention of biodiversity loss caused by alien invasive species. 2000, IUCN - the World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.

49. Green, W., Biosecurity threats to indigenous biodiversity in New Zealand. 2000, A background report prepared for the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Wellington. 61p.

50. Barker, G., BIOSECURE: a spatial model for assessing biosecurity risks in New Zealand ecosystems. 2001, Landcare Research: Hamilton.

51. MoH, Exclusion and control of exotic mosquitoes of public health significance: Report to the Minister of Biosecurity. 1997, Public Health Group, Ministry of Health: Wellington. 40p.

52. Gilbert, S., CTO MoH, Personal communication, to J. Hellstrom, 2002.

53. MAF, Schedule one to Memorandum of Understanding BA100/01: Operational agreement between the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Ministry of Health. 2002, MAF/MoH.

54. Lyons, K., Illegal releases aggravate deer problem in forests. Forest & Bird, 2002. 304: p. 10.

55. Lough, R., Review of biosecurity surveillance activities targeting terrestrial indigenous species. Notes from Interviews. 2002.

56. MAF, MAF Avian Health Survey Project Plan. 2002, MAF National Centre for Disease Investigation: Wallaceville.

57. Jackson, R., R.S. Morris, and W. Boardman, Development of a method for evaluating the risk to New Zealand's indigenous fauna from the introduction of exotic diseases and pests - including a case study on native parrots. 2000, Department of Conservation: Wellington. 94p.

58. Aldridge, V., Call to help save our frogs, in The Dominion. 2001: Wellington.

59. Bishop, P. and B. Waldman, National frog survey. 2002, Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury.

60. Hansford, D., Killer fungus attacks rare NZ frog. Forest & Bird, 2002. issue 303.

61. Meister, A., Alexander, R, The scope and nature of assessment required under the Biosecurity Act concerning the effects of pests and of pest management proposals. 1994. Department of Agricultural Economics and Business School of Applied and International Economics, Massey University publication.

62. Harris, S., Guidelines for undertaking an analysis under Section 72 of the Biosecurity Act 1993. 2000, Harris Consulting.

63. Biosecurity Act and Amendments. 1993.

64. Hellström, K. and M. Park, Biosecurity survey of New Zealand's tourism sector. 2002, Biosecurity Ltd: Endeavour Inlet. 32p.

65. Landcare, Database Integration Newsletter. 2001, Landcare: Hamilton. 8p.

66. Barratt, B.L.P., S.L. Goldson, and G.W. Bourdot, Integrating considerations of risk to indigenous flora and fauna into biosecurity risk management decisions at the border. 2000, AgResearch. 54p.

67. Williams, P.A., E. Nicol, and M. Newfield, Assessing the risk to indigenous New Zealand biota from new exotic plant taxa and genetic material. 2000, Department of Conservation: Wellington. 42p.

68. Owen, S.J., Strategic Plan for Managing Invasive Weeds. 1998, Department of Conservation.

69. DOC, Weed Surveillance SOP (1999) (includes draft Weed Surveillance Plan). 1999, Department of Conservation.

70. MDC, Regional pest management strategy for Marlborough. 2001, Marlborough District Council. 120p.

71. Operational plan for the implementation of the regional pest management strategy. 1988, Canterbury Regional Council.

72. Pest management strategy for Otago. 2001, Otago Regional Council.

73. Pest animal management annual report 2000/2001. 2001, Taranaki Regional Council.

74. MAF, National Surveillance Pest Plant Initiative, Paper to Biosecurity Technical Forum. 2000: Wellington. 6p.

75. MAF, Draft national plant pest accord. 2001, MAF Biosecurity Authority. 19p.

76. Harris, S.R. and J. Brown, Surveillance interval estimates for preventing weed incursions. 1999, Harris Consulting.

77. Ridley, G.S., et al., Threats to New Zealand's indigenous forests from exotic pathogens and pests. 2000, Department of Conservation: Wellington. 68p.

78. Owen, S.J., Ecological weeds on conservation lands in NZ - a database. 2002, DOC.

79. Frampton, R., Terms of Reference for the Forest Biosecurity Consultative Committee. 2002, MAF Biosecurity.

80. MAF, Forest Biosecurity Standard Specification for Surveillance of Gypsy Moth, 2002. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

81. MAF, Forest Biosecurity Standard Specification for Surveillance of Wood Boring and Bark Beetles, 2002. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

82. Carter, P., Risk Assessment and Pest Detection Surveys for Exotic Pests and Diseases which Threaten Commercial Forestry In New Zealand. 1989, NZFP Forests Limited.

83. Hosking, G., Bulman, L., et al, Hazard Site Review: Report and Recommendations. 1999, FRI.

84. Carter, P., Risk assessment and forest health surveys: A case for enhanced port environs surveillance. 2002, Fibre Gen.

85. Stephenson, B., MAF Biosecurity Plants. Response to the Surveillance Review Questions (memo), to B. Milne, 2002,

86. Hill, C.F., Risk Group 2 Pest Profile - Asparagus Rust-Puccinia asparagi DC-Asparagus Mite (Draft). 2001, MAF Plants Biosecurity.

87. Hill, C.F., Risk Group 2 Pest Profile - Karnal Bunt-Tilletia indica Mitra- Karnal Bunt (Draft). 2001, MAF Plants Biosecurity.

88. O'Donnell, M.R., Risk Group 2 Pest Profile - Kanzawa Mite-Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida: Kanzawa Mite, (Draft). 2000, MAF Plants Biosecurity.

89. Smales, T.E., Risk Group 2 Pest Profile - Plum Pox Potyvirus-Plum pox potyvirus; Potyviridae Sharka, (Draft). 2001, MAF Plants Biosecurity.

90. Braithwaite, M., Risk Group 2 Pest Profile - Citrus Canker- Xanthomonas axonopodis Starr & Garces emend Vauterin et al. pv. Citri (Hasse) Dye- Citrus Canker- (Draft). 2000, MAF Plants Biosecurity.

91. MAF, Specification for Cape tulip, Johnson grass, salvinia and water hyacinth surveillance and management. 2001, MAF Biosecurity Authority. 15p.

92. Vegfed, Potato Spindle Tuber Moth Viroid (PSTVd), Notes. 2002, Vegfed.

93. MAF, Animal Health Laboratory Business Summary / and Pest and Disease Surveillance Business Summary. 1998, MAF: Wellington.

94. MAF, Surveillance standard for the exotic disease response centre. 29th Sept 1998, (a draft document). Ministry of Agriculture & Fisheries Regulatory Authority.

95. MAF, Standard for MAF Biosecurity Authority Approved veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Issue No: 2. Version dated 8th August 2001. MAF Biosecurity Authority.

96. MAF, Surveillance Standard for the MAF Biosecurity Expert Parasitologist. Version 2. Issue date: 29 June 2001. MAF Biosecurity Authority.

97. MAF, Surveillance Standard for the MAF Biosecurity Expert Veterinary Pathologist. 2001, MAF Biosecurity Authority.

98. McIntyre, et al., The relative value of farmer, veterinary practitioner and diagnostic laboratory records and providing epidemiologically sound endemic disease surveillance data. 2002.

99. Pharo, H.J., Foot-and mouth disease: an assessment of the risks facing New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 2002. 50: p. 46-55.

100. Black, Whyte, and Vujcich, A sentinel veterinary practices pilot survey for animal health surveillance. MAF contract #AH206/99. 1999, Agriquality: Auckland.

101. Poland, R., Sheep Diseases Surveillance using Sentinel Veterinary Practices and Sentinel Farms-Project Summary. 2002, MAF: Wellington.

102. Thornton, R., Investigations of suspect exotic disease. in Surveillance. 2002. p. 22-23.

103. MAF, Standard for surveillance of diseases of honeybees. 2002, MAF Biosecurity Authority.

104. Sanson, R.L., C.B. King, and G.F. Mackereth, Options paper for South Island active surveillance. Appendix 5. (pages 62 - 71) in Transitional (2 year) Varroa Management Plan. Phase II of a three-phase management plan. 2000, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: Wellington.

105. Landcare Research, Biosecurity Surveillance Review. 2002, Landcare Research: Palmerston North. 14 p.

Other Published References

• Allison, N., Cost Recovery Principles for Services Provided by MAFRA. 1996, Ernst & Young. Wellington.
• Anon, A framework for apportioning funding for trade related Surveillance programs. 1998, Centre for International Economics and Bureau of Resource Sciences. Canberra.
• Anon, Australian/New Zealand standard: Risk management. 1995c, Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. 32p.
• Barker, G., BIOSECURE: a spatial model for assessing biosecurity risks in New Zealand ecosystems. 2001, Landcare Research: Hamilton. Presentation to the Biosecurity Technical Forum.
• Barratt, B.L.P., S.L. Goldson, and G.W. Bourdot, Integrating considerations of risk to indigenous flora and fauna into biosecurity risk management decisions at the border. 2000, AgResearch. Ruakura, 54p.
• Burrell, A., Outbreak, control and prevention of animal diseases: Economic aspects and policy issues. 2002, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Paris. 52p.
• Carter, P., Risk Assessment and Pest Detection Surveys for Exotic Pests and Diseases which Threaten Commercial Forestry In New Zealand. 1989, NZFP Forests Limited.
• Carter, P., Risk assessment and forest health surveys: The New Zealand experience. 2002, Fibre Gen.
• Carter, P., Risk assessment and forest health surveys: A case for enhanced port environs Surveillance. 2002, Fibre Gen.
• Davies, G. The role of the public sector in controlling the epidemic diseases of livestock. in Proceedings of the Society of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine. 1996.
• Fairburn, G., G. Greer, and R. Cullen, Monitoring the effectiveness of plant pest control in New Zealand. 1999, Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University: Canterbury. 54 p.
• Gerard, P., I. Popay, and A. Rahman, Plant protection and biosecurity: science and coordination issues for New Zealand. 1997, Ministry of Research, Science and Technology: Wellington. 68p.
• Gill, G., Action on new plant pests, in Biosecurity. 2002: Wellington.
• Green, W., Biosecurity threats to indigenous biodiversity in New Zealand. 2000, A background report prepared for the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, Wellington. 61p.
• Green, W., Review of current biosecurity research in New Zealand: Prepared for the Biosecurity Strategy Development Team. 2001, Ecologic Conservation Consultants: Wellington. 116p.
• Hackwell, K. and G. Bertram, Pests and Weeds: a blueprint for action against the impacts of introduced pest organisms on the New Zealand environment. 1999, New Zealand Conservation Authority: Wellington. 71p.
• Hanley, R. Development of a risk assessment model for introduced marine pests. in NIMS 2002: 2nd National workshop on marine biosecurity. 2002. Nelson.
• Hellström, K. and M. Park, Biosecurity survey of New Zealand's tourism sector. 2002, Biosecurity Ltd: Endeavour Inlet. 32p.
• Johnston, K., Potential Pest Indicators - Draft. 2002, Ministry for the Environment. 5p.
• Landcare Research, Biosecurity Surveillance Review. 2002, Landcare Research: Hamilton. 14 p.
• McKenna, P.B., Parabase - a new parasitological resource. Surveillance, 2000. 27: p. 14-15.
• MAF, Literature and historical review of funding and cost-sharing for exotic animal disease responses. 2001, MAF Biosecurity Authority. Wellington.
• MfE, Environmental performance indicators: Proposals for terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity. 1998, Ministry for the Environment. 126p.
• MfE, Environmental performance indicators: Confirmed indicators for the marine environment. 2001, Ministry for the Environment. 65p.
• MFish, Department Forecast Report - 1 July 2001 - 30 June 2002: presented to the House of Representatives Pursuant to Section 34a of the Public Finance Act 1989. 2001e, Ministry of Fisheries: Wellington. 65p.
• Morris, R, A framework for future disease Surveillance. Overheads from a presentation. 2002, Massey University Epicentre.
• Mumford, J., Cost benefit analysis procedures to be applied to unwanted organisms or pest responses. Draft discussion paper. 1999, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: Wellington.
• NZ, Biosecurity Act and Amendments. 1993.
• Pascoe, A., Exotic pests appear to be contained, in Biosecurity 36. 2002. p. 10.
• Penman, D.R., Managing a leaky border: towards a biosecurity research strategy. 1998, Ministry of Research, Science and Technology on behalf of the Biosecurity Council: Wellington. 61p.
• Pharo, H.J., Foot-and mouth disease: an assessment of the risks facing New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 2002. 50: p. 46-55.
• Ridley, G.S., et al., Threats to New Zealand's indigenous forests from exotic pathogens and pests. 2000, Department of Conservation: Wellington. 68p.
• Ross, M., Forest pest trapping programmes complete for season, in Biosecurity. 2002. 12p.
• Sabirovic, M., MAF BSE Programme: Trade Risk Mitigation - Standard for Prevention and Control of Certain Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies. A summary document. Issue No:1, Version: 1.0. 2001, MAF Food Authority: Wellington.
• Scott, D., Benefits of AgriBase in relation to Biosecurity and Pest and Disease Surveillance. 2002, AgriQuality New Zealand Ltd: Palmerston North.
• Sim, K., What do New Zealanders really know about biosecurity? In Biosecurity 34. 2002.
• Sinner, J. and N. Gibbs, A proposed framework for the management of biosecurity risks at the New Zealand border. Revised final report. 1988, Biosecurity Council: Wellington.
• Taylor, B., et al., New Zealand under siege: a review of the management of biosecurity risks on the environment. 2000, Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment: Wellington. 112p.
• Williams, P.A., E. Nicol, and M. Newfield, Assessing the risk to indigenous New Zealand biota from new exotic plant taxa and genetic material. 2000, Department of Conservation: Wellington. 42p.

Page last updated: 16 October 2008